672 So. 2d 116 - State v. Tart’s Empirical Analysis
1996
Citation profile
126 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 128 later decisions — most recently February 2019 · most notably 775 So. 2d 1022 - State v. Casey (2000), 950 So. 2d 583 - State v. Draughn (2007)
126 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Brady v. State of Maryland · Batson v. Kentucky · Bruton v. United States · Edwards v. Arizona
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 128 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“unwilling to say that the cumulative effect of assignments of error lacking in merit warrants reversal of a conviction or sentence.”
5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Blanchard · State v. Day“Although the mere presence of African American jurors does not necessarily defeat a Batson claim, the unanimity requirement of a capital case sentencing recommendation may be considered.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“where an attorney runs into a conflict because he or she is required to cross-examine a witness who is testifying against the defendant and who was or is a client of the attorney.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.