Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 672 So. 2d 1319 - Dobyne v. State

672 So. 2d 1319 - Dobyne v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1994

Citation profile

54
cited by 54 later decisions
2
states following
May 2015
most recently cited

54 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 54 later decisions — most recently May 2015 · most notably Loggins v. State (2000), 805 So. 2d 763 - Ex Parte Dobyne (2001)

54 state decisions

250199420002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Batson v. Kentucky · Townsend v. Sain · United States v. Young · United States v. Frady · Irvin v. Dowd

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 54 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “While an accused's intelligence and literacy are important factors to be considered in determining whether he intelligently and voluntarily waived his constitutional rights and made a confession, weak intellect or illiteracy alone will not render a confession inadmissible.”
    8 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “On the trial for any offense which may be punished capitally or by imprisonment in the penitentiary, it is a good cause of challenge by the state that the person would refuse to impose the death penalty regardless of the evidence produced or has a fixed opinion against penitentiary punishment or thinks that a conviction should not be had on circumstantial evidence, which cause of challenge may be proved by the oath of the person or by other evidence.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “The photographs of the victim were properly admitted into evidence. Photographic exhibits are admissible even though they may be cumulative, ... demonstrative of undisputed facts, ... or gruesome....”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.