Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 672 SO2D 16 - Wild v. Dozier

Wild v. Dozier’s Empirical Analysis

1996

Citation profile

27
cited by 27 later decisions
1
states following
May 2009
most recently cited

26 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 659 So. 2d 269 - Forest Park Condominium Ass'n v. Widera · 500 So. 2d 136 - Payret v. Adams · 472 So. 2d 1163 - Crusoe v. Rowls · State Ex Rel. Treadwell v. Hall · Western Group Nurseries, Inc. v. Ergas

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 27 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “... we conclude that this Court has exclusive jurisdiction to review judicial assignments ... [A] litigant who is affected by a judicial assignment made by a chief judge of a judicial circuit must challenge the assignment in the trial court and then seek review in this Court by way of petition for writ of prohibition or petition for relief under the “all writs” power.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “has exclusive jurisdiction to review judicial assignments.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “Article V, section 2(b) gives the Chief Justice of this Court, as the chief administrative officer of the judicial system, power to assign justices or judges to temporary duty in any court for which the judge is qualified and to delegate that power to the chief judges of the judicial circuits.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.