Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 672 SO2D 188 - State v. Dorsey

State v. Dorsey’s Empirical Analysis

1996

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
January 2002
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 308 So. 2d 752 - State v. McQueen · 363 So. 2d 458 - State v. Johnson · Faught v. RYDER/P I E NATIONWIDE, INC. · 396 So. 2d 297 - State v. Duncan · City of Baton Rouge v. Bourgeois

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “we hold that the defendant is not entitled to have his conviction and sentence set aside, since he sustained no prejudice by the delay in its imposition.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “entitled to imposition of sentence `without unreasonable delay'.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.