Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

672 So. 2d 34

672 So.2d 34

21 Fla.L.WeeklySupp. 167

Chung v. Fink

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided April 11, 1996

Supreme Court of Florida · decided 1996-04-11

Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently July 1998

3 state decisions

Relies on 672 So. 2d 517 - Elkins v. Syken · Forman v. Fink ex rel. Fink

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1996-04-11

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

OVERTON, Justice.

¶1We have for review Forman v. Fink, 646 So.2d 236 (Fla. 3d DCA 1994), which concerns the appropriate scope of discovery necessary to impeach the testimony of an opponent’s expert medical witness.1 We addressed this same issue in Elkins v. Syken, 672 So.2d 517 (Fla.1996). In accordance with our decision in Elkins, we approve the decision of the district court in the instant case.

¶2It is so ordered.

GRIMES, C.J., and SHAW, KOGAN, HARDING, WELLS and ANSTEAD, JJ., concur.

¶3. We have jurisdiction. Art. V, § 3(b)(3), Fla. Const.

/672/so2d/34 · .json · Public domain