¶1We have for review Forman v. Fink, 646 So.2d 236 (Fla. 3d DCA 1994), which concerns the appropriate scope of discovery necessary to impeach the testimony of an opponent’s expert medical witness.
¶2It is so ordered.
672 So. 2d 34
672 So.2d 34
21 Fla.L.WeeklySupp. 167
Decided April 11, 1996
Supreme Court of Florida · decided 1996-04-11
Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently July 1998
3 state decisions
Relies on 672 So. 2d 517 - Elkins v. Syken · Forman v. Fink ex rel. Fink
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1996-04-11
View the full empirical analysis of this case →
¶1We have for review Forman v. Fink, 646 So.2d 236 (Fla. 3d DCA 1994), which concerns the appropriate scope of discovery necessary to impeach the testimony of an opponent’s expert medical witness.
¶2It is so ordered.