Green v. Green’s Empirical Analysis
1996
Citation profile
14 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently July 2010
14 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 382 So. 2d 1197 - Canakaris v. Canakaris · Ogden Aviation Services v. Dar · Brown v. State · 510 So. 2d 1023 - Iribar v. Iribar · 595 So. 2d 214 - Kremer v. Kremer
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“In short-term marriages, the standard of living occupies considerably less prominence than in long-term marriages and is certainly not dispositive of a decision to award permanent alimony.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“This was a short-term marriage, and generally permanent alimony is inappropriate unless a genuine inequity is created by the dissolution.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Jaffy v. Jaffy“not to retrain or rehabilitate a divorcing spouse, but to ease the transition between married life and being single”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.