¶2Although I do not agree with the trial court's reasoning, it is clear to me that any error would be harmless error and that its judgment is due to be affirmed. The facts are undisputed2 and, clearly, the appellant has not demonstrated any right to maintain a nuisance that disrupts her neighbors' peaceable enjoyment of their property.
¶3SHORES, J., concurs.
2 It is undisputed that this controversy was precipitated by the appellant's insistence on allowing her dogs to defecate on the right-of-way areas of her neighbors' yards.
*785