672 So. 2d 611 - ACT CORP. v. Devane’s Empirical Analysis
1996
Citation profile
5 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Eller v. Shova · 558 So. 2d 93 - Cunningham v. Anchor Hocking Corp. · Connelly v. Arrow Air, Inc. · 646 So. 2d 237 - Breakers Palm Beach, Inc. v. Gloger · 668 So. 2d 712 - City of Lake Mary v. Franklin
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“as a matter of law until the undisputed facts show that no other remedy is available.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“to party renewing its motion after discovery, was not an appealable order under Rule 9.130(a)(3)(C)(vi) because the trial court had not determined entitlement to workers' compensation immunity as a matter of law). Both parties assert that this court has jurisdiction under Rule 9.130(a)(3)(C)(vi) because the lower court determined the issue of workers' compensation immunity”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“[i]f the trial court eventually decides there are disputed issues of material fact that preclude summary judgment, ACT can appeal from that order.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Hastings v. Demming
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.