¶1The judgment for the appellee-plaintiff under review is reversed because no good cause — by way of cognizable non-record activity or otherwise — was demonstrated to justify the failure of the predecessor trial judge to dismiss the case under Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.420(e) after a period of more than one year had elapsed without record activity. Public Health Trust v. Diaz, 529 So.2d 682 (Fla.1988); Tosar v. Sladek, 393 So.2d 61 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981); F.M.C. Corp. v. Chatman, 368 So.2d 1307 (Fla. 4th DCA 1979), cert. denied, 379 So.2d 203 (Fla.1979); Dade County v. Moreno, 227 So.2d 548 (Fla. 3d DCA 1969).
672 So. 2d 886
Lamberto v. Artime
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided May 1, 1996
District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1996-05-01
Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently March 2003
1 state decisions
Relies on Cooper v. State · 368 So. 2d 1307 - FMC Corp. v. Chatman · Moore v. Moore
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1996-05-01
View the full empirical analysis of this case →