672 So. 2d 933 - State v. Prout’s Empirical Analysis
1996
Citation profile
6
cited by 6 later decisions
2
states following
June 2004
most recently cited
6 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Batson v. Kentucky · Washington v. Davis · Hernandez v. New York · Purkett v. Elem · MacArthur Co. v. Johns-Manville Corp.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Code of Criminal Procedure article 831(3) provides that a defendant charged with a felony shall be present at the calling, examination, challenging, empanelling (sic), and swearing of the jury and "at any subsequent proceedings for the discharge of the jury or a juror." Id. See State v. White, 244 La. 585 , 153 So.2d 401 (1963). This rule ... does not prevent a trial court from acting summarily to dismiss a juror in an emergency unless the defendant can show that he has been prejudiced thereby....”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Turner“at any subsequent proceedings for the discharge of the jury or a juror.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Turner
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.