Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 672 S.W.2d 600 - Eckert v. State

Eckert v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1984

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
March 2006
most recently cited

6 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently March 2006

6 state decisions

30198419902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Carrillo v. State · Wilder v. State · Bray v. State · Mauldin v. State · Smith v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The same rules apply to both State and defense counsel. Neither is at liberty to misstate the law. It has often been held that error in argument does not lie in going beyond the court’s charge, but in stating law contrary to the same.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.