Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 673 F.2d 1036 - Adams v. Howerton

Adams v. Howerton’s Empirical Analysis

673 F.2d 1036 · 1982

Citation profile

102
cited by 102 later decisions
2
cited 2 times by the Supreme Court
7
states following
June 2017
most recently cited

52 federal appellate · 8 district · 9 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 102 later decisions (2 by the Supreme Court) — most recently June 2017 · most notably 135 S. Ct. 2584 - Obergefell v. Hodges (2015), Agyeman v. Immigration & Naturalization Service (2002)

52 federal appellate · 8 district · 9 state decisions

3501982199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Consumer Product Safety Commission v. GTE Sylvania, Inc. · Bolling v. Sharpe · Loving v. Commonwealth of Virginia · Skinner v. State of Oklahoma Williamson · Southeastern Community College v. Davis

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 102 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “interpret language in one section of a statute consistently with language of other sections and with the purposes of the entire statute considered as a whole.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[e]ven if it were [a fundamental right], we would not apply a strict scrutiny standard of review to the statute”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “In the enforcement of ... [immigration policies], the Executive Branch of the Government must respect the procedural safeguards of due process.... [even if] the formulation of these policies is entrusted exclusively to Congress.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.