Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 673 F.2d 1185 - Rogers v. McMullen

Rogers v. McMullen’s Empirical Analysis

673 F.2d 1185 · 1982

Citation profile

39
cited by 39 later decisions
July 2017
most recently cited

20 federal appellate · 1 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 39 later decisions — most recently July 2017 · most notably Dyer v. Calderon (1998), O'Bryan v. Wj Estelle (1983)

20 federal appellate · 1 district ·

2101982199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)

Relies on Wainwright v. Sykes · Bonner v. City of Prichard · Duncan v. State of Louisiana · Smith v. Phillips · Peters v. Kiff

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 39 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “federal courts in such proceedings must not disturb the findings of state courts unless the federal habeas court articulate[d] some basis for disarming such findings of the statutory presumption that they are correct ....”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
    e.g. O'Bryan v. Wj Estelle
  2. “a state criminal defendant who can demonstrate that a member of the jury which heard his case was biased ... is entitled to federal habeas corpus relief.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
    e.g. Depree v. Thomas
  3. “as binding precedent all of the decisions of the former Fifth Circuit handed down prior to the close of business on September 30, 1981.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
    e.g. Phillips v. Smith

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.