Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 673 F.2d 160 - Parker v. Schweiker

Parker v. Schweiker’s Empirical Analysis

673 F.2d 160 · 1982

Citation profile

29
cited by 29 later decisions
November 2004
most recently cited

12 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 29 later decisions — most recently November 2004 · most notably Doran v. Schweiker (1982), Gloria YOUNG; Alicia Young; Nicholas Young, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, Defendant-Appellee (1986)

12 federal appellate ·

200198219902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Adams v. Weinberger · Boyland v. Califano · Mendoza v. Secretary of Health & Human Services · Santiago v. Mathews

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 29 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “must be evaluated in light of the father and child's actual circumstances.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “16 The ALJ's finding that Mace, an insured individual, was the natural father of Kyle Doran is undisputed. Doran has thus fulfilled the first requirement of 42 U.S.C. § 416(h)(3)(C)(ii). 17 Doran must also prove that his father was”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “is clearly intended to permit an applicant to prove parentage by a deceased insured in the absence of the formal indicators recognized by” §§ (h)(2)(B), (h)(3)(A), (h)(3)(B), and (h)(3)(C)(i). The”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.