Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 673 F.2d 330 - Chatfield v. Ricketts

Chatfield v. Ricketts’s Empirical Analysis

673 F.2d 330 · 1982

Citation profile

11
cited by 11 later decisions
4
states following
August 2019
most recently cited

5 federal appellate · 1 district · 4 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 11 later decisions — most recently August 2019

5 federal appellate · 1 district · 4 state decisions

801982199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · Serfass v. United States · United States v. Sanford · Bassing v. Cady · Jerry Allen Arnold v. D. J. McCarthy Superintendent, California Men's Colony

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “In federal habeas corpus proceedings, when a criminal defendant challenges his state conviction on sufficiency of the evidence grounds, the defendant is entitled to habeas corpus relief only if 'no rational trier of fact could have found proof of guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.'”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “The Sanford court obviously concluded that since the government has a right to retry the defendant following a mistrial because of a hung jury, the period following the mistrial is a pretrial period. During the pretrial period, a prosecutor may dismiss charges, and the Double Jeopardy Clause does not prohibit the prosecutor from reasserting the same charges at a later date.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.