Vander Malle v. Ambach’s Empirical Analysis
673 F.2d 49 · 1982
Citation profile
20 federal appellate · 3 district · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 51 later decisions — most recently April 2005 · most notably Kapps v. Wing (2005), Alexopulos v. San Francisco Unified School District (1987)
20 federal appellate · 3 district · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Connecticut v. Mohegan Tribe · Battle v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania · Monahan v. State of Nebraska · 491 F. Supp. 1074 - Monahan v. State of Neb. · Stemple v. Board of Education of Prince George's County
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 51 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“to undertake payments for continuation of a child's placement that has been selected unilaterally by the parents”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“entitled to have [student] examined by a qualified psychiatrist of their choosing.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“whether the State defendants have an interim obligation to continue Bruce at the Institute until a lawful alternative placement is made.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Fallis v. Ambach
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.