Warrant Authorizing Interception of Oral Communications Within Premises Known As 165 Atwells Avenue Providence Rhode Island’s Empirical Analysis
673 F.2d 5 · 1982
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 3 district · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently March 2017
1 federal appellate · 3 district · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Califano v. Yamasaki · Alioto Et Al. v. Williams Et Al. · Joseph B. Williams and Leo Bazille v. Joseph L. Alioto
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[M]ay in his discretion make available to such person [who had been provided an inventory] or his counsel for inspection such portions of the intercepted communications, applications and orders as the judge determines to be in the interest of justice.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“clearly authorizes the district court to order that documents be disclosed to an intercepted party.”). . The Movants proceeded under the assumption that “interest of justice” was a less-onerous burden than the”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“the court did not have jurisdiction over any ordinary civil action.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.