Kirksey v. Jones’s Empirical Analysis
673 F.2d 58 · 1982
Citation profile
13 federal appellate · 1 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 23 later decisions — most recently December 2010
13 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Bruton v. United States · Picard v. Connor · Relford v. Commandant, U. S. Disciplinary Barracks · Parker v. Randolph · United States v. Modica
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 23 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““Alleging lack of a fair trial does not convert every complaint about evidence or a prosecutor’s summation into a federal due process claim.””
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“disregard[ing] the instructions and urg[ing] the jury to convict one defendant because his co-defendant has confessed.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Holland v. Scully
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.