Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 673 F.2d 773 - Miller v. Central Dispatch, Inc.

Miller v. Central Dispatch, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis

673 F.2d 773 · 1982

Citation profile

34
cited by 34 later decisions
January 2009
most recently cited

31 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 34 later decisions — most recently January 2009 · most notably Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs v. Rowe (1983), Boudreaux v. American Workover, Inc. (1982)

31 federal appellate ·

210198219902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 46 · 33 U.S.C. § 901 · 33 U.S.C. § 902 · 33 U.S.C. § 903 · 33 U.S.C. § 914 · 33 U.S.C. § 921 · 33 U.S.C. § 922 · 8 U.S.C. § 1225 (§ 235 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter))

Relies on Southern Pacific Co. v. Jensen · Gilbert v. First National Bank of Jackson · Swansboro Country, Inc. v. Lumberman's Mortgage Co. · Northeast Marine Terminal Co. v. Caputo · M. Morrin & Son Co. v. Burgess Construction Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 34 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “'considering errors of law and making certain that the BRB adhered to its statutory standard of review of factual determinations, that is, whether the ALJ's findings of fact are supported by substantial evidence and consistent with the law.' " Avondale Shipyards, Inc. v. Kennel, 914 F.2d 88 , 90 (5th Cir.1990) (quoting Miller v. Central Dispatch, Inc., 673 F.2d 773 , 778 (5th Cir. Unit A 1982)); accord Tanner v. Ingalls Shipbuilding, 2 F.3d 143 , 144 (5th Cir.1993); Empire United Stevedores v. Gatlin, 936 F.2d 819 , 822 (5th Cir.1991). In our review we "may not substitute [our] judgment for that of the ALJ, nor may we reweigh or reappraise the evidence,”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “any person engaged in maritime employment, including any longshoreman ... harborworker,”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent
  3. “(n)o compensation shall be payable in respect of the disability or death of-(1) A master or member of a crew of any vessel....”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.