Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 673 F.2d 994 - Myron v. Hauser

Myron v. Hauser’s Empirical Analysis

673 F.2d 994 · 1982

Citation profile

32
cited by 32 later decisions
February 2025
most recently cited

24 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 32 later decisions — most recently February 2025 · most notably Schofield v. First Commodity Corp. of Boston (1986), Monieson v. Commodity Futures Trading Commission (1993)

24 federal appellate ·

18019821990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 7 U.S.C. § 12A · 7 U.S.C. § 16 · 7 U.S.C. § 18 · 7 U.S.C. § 60 · 7 U.S.C. § 6B · 7 U.S.C. § 6C · 7 U.S.C. § 6D · 7 U.S.C. § 9

Relies on Ernst & Ernst v. Hochfelder · National Labor Relations Board v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp. · Beacon Theaters Inc v. C Westover · Crowell v. Benson · Dairy Queen, Inc. v. Wood

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 32 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “is something other than mechanically reweighing the evidence to ascertain in which direction it preponderates: it is rather to review the record with the purpose of determining whether the finder of fact was justified, i.e., acted reasonably, in concluding that the evidence, including the demeanor of the witnesses, the reasonable inferences drawn therefrom and other pertinent circumstances, supported [the] findings.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “there is little or no basis for concluding that the (Seventh) Amendment should now be interpreted to provide an impenetrable barrier to administrative factfinding under otherwise valid federal regulatory statutes. We cannot conclude that the Amendment rendered Congress powerless — when it concluded that remedies available in courts of law were inadequate to cope with a problem within Congress’ power to regulate — to create new public rights and remedies by statute and commit their enforcement, if it chose, to a tribunal other than a court of law— such as an administrative agency — in which facts are not found by juries.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “the findings of the Commission as to the facts, if supported by the weight of evidence, shall be conclusive.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.