Phillips v. Ornoski’s Empirical Analysis
673 F.3d 1168 · 2012
Citation profile
6 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Brady v. State of Maryland · United States v. Bagley · United States v. Agurs · Giglio v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[T]he prosecution's Napue violations, although 'pernicious' and 'reprehensible,' were not material to [petitioner's] conviction of first-degree murder.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrencee.g. Panah v. Chappell“reasonable likelihood that the false testimony could have affected the judgment of the jury.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrencee.g. Panah v. Chappell“received a fair trial, understood as a trial resulting in a verdict worthy of confidence.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrencee.g. Panah v. Chappell
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.