Gonzalez v. Holder’s Empirical Analysis
673 F.3d 35 · 2012
Citation profile
7 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 8 U.S.C. § 1101 (§ 101 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1227 (§ 237 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1229B (§ 240a of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1252 (§ 242 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter))
Relies on Sony BMG Music Entertainment v. Tenenbaum · Ayeni v. Holder · Spooner v. EEN, Inc. · Castañeda-Castillo v. Holder · Grimsdale v. Kash N' Karry Food Stores, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“we focus our review on the decision of the BIA.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“) granted Alvarado cancellation of removal under the Nicaraguan Adjustment and Central American Relief Act (”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Alvarado v. Whitaker“constitutional claims and questions of law.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Alvarado v. Whitaker
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.