Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 673 F. Supp. 2d 358 - Various v. Various

673 F. Supp. 2d 358 - Various v. Various’s Empirical Analysis

2009

Citation profile

29
cited by 29 later decisions
February 2022
most recently cited

1 district ·

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1332 (Class Action Fairness Act of 2005) · 28 U.S.C. § 1404 · 28 U.S.C. § 1407 · 28 U.S.C. § 1446 · 43 U.S.C. § 1301 (Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act) · 43 U.S.C. § 1349

Relies on Bell v. Hood · Van Dusen v. Barrack · Smith v. Kansas City Title & Trust Co. · Ward v. Sentry Title Co. · Boyer v. Snap-On Tools Corp.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 29 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “On matters of procedure, the [MDL] transferee court must apply federal law as interpreted by the court of the district where the transferee court sits.”); id. at 366 (”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[I]n cases where jurisdiction is based on federal question, this Court, as the transferee court, will apply federal law as interpreted by the Third Circuit.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “it is possible that a party is not fraudulently joined, but that the claim against that party [will] ultimately [be] dismissed for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.