673 F. Supp. 2d 8 - Harris v. Koenig’s Empirical Analysis
2009
Citation profile
5 district ·
Relationships
Applies 29 U.S.C. § 1001 (§ 2 of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974) · 29 U.S.C. § 1106 (§ 406 of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974) · 29 U.S.C. § 1113 (§ 413 of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974)
Relies on Foman v. Davis · Mayle v. Felix · Firestone v. K Firestone · Jones v. Bernanke · Atchinson v. District of Columbia
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“New Waste Investment Committee”) and its individual Trustee Members, the State Street Bank and Trust Company (”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“Old Waste Fiduciaries,” which are Old Waste (the Plan's sponsor), the Waste Management, Inc. Profit Sharing and Savings Plan Investment Committee (”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Harris v. Koenig · Harris v. Koenig“New Waste Plan”), the Investment Committee of the Waste Management Retirement Savings Plan (”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.