Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 673 NW2D 482 - State v. Peterson

State v. Peterson’s Empirical Analysis

2004

Citation profile

9
cited by 9 later decisions
1
states following
February 2017
most recently cited

8 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on In the Matter of Samuel Winship · Sullivan v. Louisiana · United States v. Ruppel · State v. Nelson · Merrill v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “10 Minn. Dist. Judges Ass'n, Minnesota Practice—Jury Instruction Guides, Criminal, CRIMJIG 7.10 (5th ed.2006). The court has the”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “obligation to clearly instruct the jurors on exactly what it is that they must decide.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.