Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 673 P2D 651 - Tageant v. State

Tageant v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1983

Citation profile

11
cited by 11 later decisions
3
states following
August 2014
most recently cited

11 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 11 later decisions — most recently August 2014

11 state decisions

601983199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Rodriguez v. New York · Leary v. United States · 12 Cal. 3d 220 - People v. Vann · Jordan v. State · Witters v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(a) attempts to dispose of the property at an amount considerably below its fair value; (b) an unusual manner of acquisition or dealing with the property; (c) knowledge of the accused beforehand of the location, nature, or value of the property later stolen; (d) prior possession of other stolen property by the accused; (e) the relative length of time between the theft and fact of possession; (£) admissions or contradictory or evasive statements by the accused; and (g) other incriminating evidence and circumstances surrounding the entire incident.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “proof of mere naked possession of recently stolen property not aided by other proof that the accused received it with knowledge that it was stolen, is insufficient”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “Guilty knowledge may be established by direct evidence, circumstantial evidence, or by both types of evidence.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.