Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 673 SE2D 280 - In Re RS

In Re RS’s Empirical Analysis

2009

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
August 2010
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · In the Interest of R. J. S. · In the Interest of M. D. L. · In the Interest of A. A. · In the Interest of D. T.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “When reviewing the sufficiency of evidence supporting a juvenile court's adjudication, we apply the same standard of review used in criminal cases. We construe the evidence in favor of the court's adjudication and determine if a rational trier of fact could have found beyond a reasonable doubt that the juvenile committed the acts charged. [1]”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “[a]ny person who shall have on or within arm's reach of his or her person a firearm or a knife having a blade of three or more inches in length during the commission of, or the attempt to commit: ... (2) The unlawful entry into a building or vehicle ... and which crime is a felony, commits a felony”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
    e.g. In Re Jd

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.