In Re JS’s Empirical Analysis
2009
Citation profile
6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
June 2018
most recently cited
6 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 241 Ga. App. 609 - In Re Bmb · In the Interest of A. G. · In the Interest of M. E. · In the Interest of L. F. · In Re Lf
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Lack of stable housing and lack of support due to a parent's unstable or irregular employment are appropriate factors in determining deprivation.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“We recognize the gravity of any intervention by the State into the parent-child relationship, and we do not lightly undertake our duty to examine the sufficiency of the evidence supporting a finding of deprivation. Nevertheless, this case turns largely on critical factual issues, including determining witness credibility, that can only be resolved by the factfinder who properly weighs the evidence and who has the benefit of observing live witness testimony. We are mindful of the appellate standard of review which confines us only to determining whether any rational trier of fact could have found by clear and convincing evidence that the child was deprived.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“Evidence of a parent's repeated unfounded investigations of sexual abuse has been held to be an appropriate factor in a finding of deprivation.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.