Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

673 S.E.2d 658

Docket No. 220A08.

State v. Llamas-Hernandez

STATE of North Carolina v. Mario LLAMAS-HERNANDEZ.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided February 6, 2009.

Supreme Court of North Carolina · decided 2009-02-06

Cited by 23 later decisions — most recently August 2019

23 state decisions

Key passage — most relied on by later courts

“the reasons stated in the dissenting opinion,”

quoted by 1 later decision, including State v. Carter

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2009-02-06

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1Roy Cooper, Attorney General, by LaToya B. Powell, Assistant Attorney General, for the State.

¶2Kevin P. Tully, Public Defender, by Julie Ramseur Lewis, Assistant Public Defender, for defendant-appellant.

¶3PER CURIAM.

¶4For the reasons stated in the dissenting opinion, the decision of the Court of Appeals is reversed.

¶5REVERSED.

/673/se2d/658 · .json · Public domain