Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

673 So. 2d 130

Mizell v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1996-05-08

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently December 1997

1 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1996-05-08

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM.

¶1We affirm. However, we remand for the trial court to enter a written order of revocation of probation and to resolve the discrepancy in the sentence between the credit given at probation revocation (132 days) and the amount of credit given at the original sen*131tencing (183 days). Additionally, the trial court should consider whether appellant is entitled to credit for time served in the Department of Corrections as well as time served in jail awaiting final hearing.

STONE, WARNER and GROSS, JJ., concur.
/673/so2d/130 · .json · Public domain