Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 673 SO2D 1317 - Page v. Page

Page v. Page’s Empirical Analysis

1996

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
September 2016
most recently cited

8 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently September 2016

8 state decisions

40199620002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Canter v. Koehring Company · Hensgens v. Hensgens · Hensgens v. Hensgens · 647 So. 2d 414 - Boyd v. Boyd · 592 So. 2d 862 - Stanley v. Stanley

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Where a consent decree is at issue, the burden of proof is on the party moving for modification to show a material change in circumstances affecting the welfare of the children since the original decree and that the proposed change is in the best interest of the children. Hensgens v. Hensgens, 94-1200 (La.App. 3 Cir. 3/15/95) ; 653 So.2d 48 , writ denied, 95-1488 (La.9/22/95); 660 So.2d 478 .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.