Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 673 So. 2d 256 - State v. Morgan

673 So. 2d 256 - State v. Morgan’s Empirical Analysis

1996

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
February 2014
most recently cited

8 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on State v. Dorthey · State v. Sepulvado · 603 So. 2d 739 - State v. Lobato · State v. Young · 593 So. 2d 704 - State v. Scott

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[T]he 1974 Louisiana Constitution, Article 1, Section 20 `gives the courts, in the exercise of their judicial power, a basis for determining that sentences, whether fine, imprisonment or otherwise, though not cruel or unusual, are too severe as punishment for certain conduct and thus unconstitutional. It is a basis for extending the court's control over the entire sentencing process.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “However, where the trial court provides adequate support for its decision to impose a sentence under Dorthey , and the record reflects that the sentence was imposed after careful consideration of the particular defendant and the facts of the case, this court will not reverse the sentence imposed by the trial court unless it finds that the trial court abused its broad discretion.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.