Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 673 So. 2d 3 - Marcolini v. State

673 So. 2d 3 - Marcolini v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1996

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
December 2008
most recently cited

5 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Sandstrom v. Montana · Mullaney v. Wilbur · Patterson v. New York · American Manufacturers Mutual Insurance v. United States · County Court of Ulster Cty. v. Allen

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “A mandatory rebuttable presumption requires the trier of fact to presume an element of a crime upon proof of a basic or evidentiary fact unless the defendant comes forward with evidence to rebut the finding of that element.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “a criminal statutory presumption must be regarded as `irrational' or `arbitrary,' and hence unconstitutional, unless it can at least be said with substantial assurance that the presumed fact is more likely than not to flow from the proved fact on which it is made to depend.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent
  3. “A permissive inference allows, but does not require, the trier of fact to infer an elemental fact [service] upon proof of a basic fact [return of service] and places no burden on the defendant.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.