673 So. 2d 382 - Turner v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1996
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
January 2005
most recently cited
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Carr v. State · 573 So. 2d 1340 - Turner v. State · 573 So. 2d 1335 - Turner v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The Petitioner has failed to prove to the Court in both cases by a preponderance of the evidence that the alleged newly discovered evidence is of such nature that it would be practically conclusive that had such evidence been introduced at trial, it would have resulted in a different verdict.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“the appropriate standard of review is whether Turner proved by a preponderance of the evidence that material facts existed which had not been previously heard and which required the vacation of his conviction or sentence.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“[a] person convicted of perjury or subornation of perjury shall not be a competent witness in any case, even though pardoned or punished for the same.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Fuselier v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.