Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

673 So. 2d 541

Docket No. 95-3145.

Delancy v. State

Walter DELANCY, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1996-05-08

Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently January 2013

4 state decisions

Key passage — most relied on by later courts

“[i]f a recommended sentence under the guidelines exceeds the maximum sentence otherwise authorized by s. 775.082, the sentence under the guidelines must be imposed, absent a departure.”

quoted by 2 later decisions, including 691 So. 2d 502 - Green v. State, 692 So. 2d 199 - Martinez v. State

Relies on 634 So. 2d 618 - Florida Dept. of Revenue v. Herre · 645 So. 2d 417 - City of Sarasota v. Mikos · Taylor v. State

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1996-05-08

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender, and Kenneth P. Speiller, Special Assistant Public Defender, for appellant.

¶2Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, and Richard L. Polin, Assistant Attorney General, and Aleida Cantalapiedra, Certified Legal Intern, for appellee.

¶3Before COPE, GERSTEN and FLETCHER, JJ.

¶4PER CURIAM.

¶5Walter Delancy appeals his convictions and sentences for armed robbery and aggravated assault with a firearm. He contends that it is impermissible to convict him of both offenses. We disagree and affirm on authority of Taylor v. State,608 So.2d 804, 805 (Fla. 1992), and Owens v. State,626 So.2d 240, 242 (Fla. 2d DCA 1993), review denied,634 So.2d 626 (Fla.1994).

¶6Defendant's reliance on State v. Stearns,645 So.2d 417 (Fla.1994), is misplaced. Stearns must be read in the context of its particular facts, and in tandem with the decision on which it relies, State v. Brown,633 So.2d 1059 (Fla.1994). Stearns and Brown do not recede from Taylor v. State.

¶7We find no merit in defendant's argument that the trial court should have granted a mistrial.

¶8Defendant argues that his 6-year sentence for aggravated assault exceeds the 5-year legal maximum. See §§ 775.082(3)(d), 784.021, Fla.Stat. (1993). However, the date of defendant's crime was April 27, 1994. Effective January 1, 1994, "[i]f a recommended sentence under the guidelines exceeds the maximum sentence otherwise authorized by § 775.082, the sentence under the guidelines must be imposed, absent a departure." § 921.001(5), Fla.Stat. (1993); Gardner v. State,661 So.2d 1274 (Fla. 5th DCA 1995). The guideline range in this case was 4.3 years to 7.1 years. The 6-year sentence is legal under subsection 921.001(5).

¶9Affirmed.

/673/so2d/541 · .json · Public domain