Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 674 A.2d 910 - Dutil v. Burns

Dutil v. Burns’s Empirical Analysis

1996

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
1
states following
March 2025
most recently cited

1 district · 9 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently March 2025

1 district · 9 state decisions

401996200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Musk v. Nelson · Thibeault v. Larson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “any action for damages for injury or death against any health care provider, its agents or employees, or health care practitioner, his agents or employees, whether based upon tort or breach of contract or otherwise, arising out of the provision or failure to provide health care services.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.