Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 674 F.2d 427 - Claus v. Gyorkey

Claus v. Gyorkey’s Empirical Analysis

674 F.2d 427 · 1982

Citation profile

44
cited by 44 later decisions
1
states following
July 2014
most recently cited

23 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 44 later decisions — most recently July 2014 · most notably 481 So. 2d 247 - Shaw v. Burchfield (1985), Williamson v. United States Department of Agriculture (1987)

23 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

3801982199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1442

Relies on Butz v. Economou · Barr v. Matteo · United Gas Improvement Co. v. Continental Oil Co. · Virgil Norton, Virgil Wesley and James Chapman v. James P. McShane · Snohomish County v. Seattle Disposal Company

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 44 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “'the action of the federal official bear some reasonable relation to and connection with his duties and responsibilities ...,'”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “absent an allegation of a tort of constitutional magnitude, federal officials are entitled to absolute immunity for ordinary torts committed within the scope of their jobs.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “Norton v. McShane, 332 F.2d 855 (5th Cir.1964), cert. denied, 380 U.S. 981, 85 S.Ct. 1345, 14 L.Ed.2d 274 (1965). 6 The”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.