United States v. Escobar’s Empirical Analysis
674 F.2d 469 · 1982
Citation profile
35 federal appellate · 3 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 44 later decisions — most recently January 2012 · most notably United States v. Manbeck (1984), United States v. Webster (1984)
35 federal appellate · 3 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Brady v. State of Maryland · Glasser v. United States · Kotteakos v. United States · United States v. Agurs · Hamling v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 44 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[t]here was no hint that defense counsel deliberately avoided making proper objections in an attempt to later sandbag the prosecution”). 36 . United States v. Habel, 613 F.2d 1321 , 1327-28 (5th Cir.1980); see, e.g., Mendoza- Medina, 346 F.3d at 131-132 (”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.