Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 674 F.2d 721 - Wade v. Lockhart

Wade v. Lockhart’s Empirical Analysis

674 F.2d 721 · 1982

Citation profile

14
cited by 14 later decisions
October 2002
most recently cited

8 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently October 2002

8 federal appellate ·

120198219902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Seemiller v. Wyrick

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Should the state court render a decision unfavorable to appellant, then the district court should consider anew the question whether state appeal should be excused. See Mucie v. Missouri State Department of Corrections, supra.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.