Etta v. Seaboard Enterprises, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis
674 F.2d 913 · 1982
Citation profile
6 federal appellate · 4 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently June 2009
6 federal appellate · 4 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 15 U.S.C. § 1601 (§ 102 of the Truth in Lending Act) · 15 U.S.C. § 1602 (§ 103 of the Truth in Lending Act) · 15 U.S.C. § 1635 (§ 125 of the Truth in Lending Act) · 28 U.S.C. § 294
Relies on Copeland v. Marshall · Eby v. Reb Realty, Inc. · Sellers v. Wollman · Eugene Roosevelt Powers and Lila Virginia Powers v. Sims and Levin · Rudisell v. Fifth Third Bank
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“a court may condition the granting of rescission upon plaintiff's repayment of the principal amount of the loan to the creditor.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.