Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 674 F.3d 1062 - Brock v. Astrue

Brock v. Astrue’s Empirical Analysis

674 F.3d 1062 · 2012

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
August 2015
most recently cited

3 federal appellate ·

Relationships

Relies on McCoy v. Schweiker · Tucker v. Heckler · Thompson v. Bowen · Ellis v. Barnhart · Reed v. Sullivan

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Substantial evidence is evidence that a reasonable person might accept as adequate to support a decision but is less than a preponderance. Juszczyk v. Astrue, 542 F.3d 626, 631 (8th Cir.2008). We consider the record as a whole, including evidence that detracts from, as well as supports, the Commissioner’s decision. Ellis v. Barnhart, 392 F.3d 988, 993 (8th Cir.2005).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.