Idy v. Holder’s Empirical Analysis
674 F.3d 111 · 2012
Citation profile
12 federal appellate · 2 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 8 U.S.C. § 1182 (§ 212 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1227 (§ 237 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1252 (§ 242 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter))
Relies on Gailius v. Immigration & Naturalization Service · Knapik v. Ashcroft · Franklin v. Immigration and Naturalization Service · Cabral v. Immigration & Naturalization Service · Sasan Maghsoudi v. Immigration and Naturalization Service
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“We review legal conclusions de novo, 'with appropriate deference to the agency's interpretation of the underlying statute in accordance with administrative law principles.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“Where, as here, the BIA adopted and affirmed the IJ's ruling, and discussed some of the bases for the IJ's opinion, we review both the BIA's and IJ's opinions.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“when he is aware of and consciously disregards a substantial and unjustifiable risk that such result will occur or that such circumstance exists.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.