Arthur v. Thomas’s Empirical Analysis
674 F.3d 1257 · 2012
Citation profile
15 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2244 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996) · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))
Relies on Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly · Gregg v. Georgia · Baze v. Rees · Nelson v. Campbell Commissioner Alabama Department of Corrections et al. · Medley
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 36 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[i]f a law treats individuals differently on the basis of ... [a] suspect classification, or if the law impinges on a fundamental right, it is subject to strict scrutiny.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“insured” and all others in the property involved and all liens on the property; (3) Other insurance which may cover the loss; (4) Changes in title or occupancy of the property during the term of the policy; (5) Specifications of damaged buildings and detailed repair estimates; (6)The inventory of damaged personal property described in 2.e above; (7) Receipts for additional living expenses incurred and records that support the fair rental value loss; and (8)Evidence or affidavit that supports a claim under the Credit Card, Fund Transfer Card, Forgery and Counterfeit Money coverage, stating the amount and cause of loss. . This court lacks jurisdiction over the portion of the complaint that seeks a refund of $6,746 in New York state income taxes. See 28 U.S.C. § 1491 (a). . As these cases indicate, "where the plaintiff refers to certain documents in the complaint and those documents are central to the plaintiff's claim, then the Court may consider the documents part of the pleadings for purposes of Rule 12(b)(6) dismissal, and the defendant’s attaching such documents to the motion to dismiss will not require conversion of the motion into a motion for summary judgment.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.