Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 674 F.3d 456 - Bishop v. Arcuri

Bishop v. Arcuri’s Empirical Analysis

674 F.3d 456 · 2012

Citation profile

19
cited by 19 later decisions
1
states following
September 2018
most recently cited

4 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

Relationships

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Relies on Harlow v. Fitzgerald · Anderson v. Creighton · Board of the County Commissioners of Bryan County v. Brown · Wilson v. Arkansas · Richards v. Wisconsin

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “In order to justify a “no-knock” entry, the police must have a reasonable suspicion that knocking and announcing their presence, under the particular circumstances, would be dangerous or futile, or that it would inhibit the effective investigation of the crime by, for example, allowing the destruction of evidence.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “the [employee's] understanding of common operating procedure is highly relevant to the existence of a custom.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.