Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 674 F.3d 980 - United States v. Clutter

United States v. Clutter’s Empirical Analysis

674 F.3d 980 · 2012

Citation profile

32
cited by 32 later decisions
3
states following
August 2024
most recently cited

17 federal appellate · 4 state decisions

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 2252

Relies on United States v. Matlock · United States v. Place · Texas v. Brown · United States v. Jacobsen · Illinois v. Rodriguez

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 32 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[w]here law enforcement authorities have probable cause to believe that a container holds contraband or evidence of a crime, but have not secured a warrant, the Court has interpreted the [Fourth] Amendment to permit seizure of the property, pending issuance of a warrant to examine its contents, if the exigencies of the circumstances demand it or some other recognized exception to the warrant requirement is present.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.