Schlueter v. Cozad’s Empirical Analysis
1987
Citation profile
Relationships
Applies 15 U.S.C. § 77D (§ 4 of the Securities Act of 1933)
Relies on Board of Regents of Univ. of State of NY v. Tomanio · Glus v. Brooklyn Eastern District Terminal · John Nuveen & Co., Inc. v. Henry T. Sanders · Securities and Exchange Commission v. Seaboard Corporation Admiralty Fund · Sanders v. John Nuveen & Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“In all averments of fraud or mistake, the circumstances constituting fraud or mistake shall be stated with particularity. Malice, intent, knowledge, and other condition of mind of a person may be averred generally.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Williams v. Sabin
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.