Evans v. Sebelius’s Empirical Analysis
2009
Citation profile
6 district ·
Relationships
Applies 29 U.S.C. § 633A (§ 15 of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967) · 42 U.S.C. § 2000E (§ 717 of the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964)
Relies on Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc. · Celotex Corporation v. Catrett H · Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio Corporation · McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Green · Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Def.’s Mem.”), the Plaintiff's Opposition to Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss!,] or[ ]Alternatively, for Summary Judgment (the “Pl.’s Mem.”), the Defendant’s Reply to Plaintiff’s Opposition to Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss, or Alternatively, for Summary Judgment (the”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Evans v. Sebelius“the non-moving party cannot rely upon inadmissible evidence to survive summary judgment; rather, [she] must rely on evidence that would arguably be admissible at trial.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.