Oceana, Inc. v. Locke’s Empirical Analysis
2009
Citation profile
6 district ·
Relationships
Applies 42 U.S.C. § 4321 (§ 2 of the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969) · 5 U.S.C. § 706
Relies on Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. Volpe · Camp v. Pitts · Environmental Defense Fund, Inc. v. Costle · Esch v. Yeutter · Izaak Walton League of America v. Marsh
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[A]n SBRM can be viewed as the combination of sampling design, data collection procedures, and analyses used to estimate bycatch in multiple fisheries.”); 3959.) 18 . Plaintiff argues that the agency's establishment of the 30 percent CV performance standard for bycatch data collection acknowledged”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“coefficient of variation.” (AR 3884.) The SBRM defines”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.