Bostan v. Obama’s Empirical Analysis
2009
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2246 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on Jackson v. Denno · Linkletter v. Walker · Rogers v. Richmond · Concrete Pipe & Products of Cal., Inc. v. Construction Laborers Pension Trust for Southern Cal. · Rugendorf v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“the Supreme Court mentioned only the possibility of considering hearsay proffered by the government in Hamdi and Boumediene,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“[T]he Due Process Clause of the Fifth Amendment, does not apply to Guantanamo detainees.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Ali v. Trump
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.