Ingram v. Syverson’s Empirical Analysis
2004
Citation profile
1 district · 3 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently October 2024
1 district · 3 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Fabio v. Bellomo · Offerdahl v. University of Minnesota Hospitals & Clinics · Wartnick v. Moss & Barnett · Hiber v. City of St. Paul · Paidar v. Hughes
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Where reasonable minds can differ on the issue of causation, the [factfinder] should resolve the issue, and it would be error to grant summary judgment.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.